ISSN 3139-7409Peer-ReviewedOpen Access
JESS Medical Journals

How JESS evaluates submitted research

A transparent overview of the editorial and peer-review stages described by JESS.

01

Editorial screening

Submissions first undergo an initial editorial assessment for scope, suitability and basic submission requirements.

02

Originality verification

JESS states that submissions undergo plagiarism and originality verification before progressing through the editorial process.

03

Double-blind peer review

The journal describes its review model as independent double-blind peer review, with manuscripts assessed on scientific merit and relevance.

04

Academic evaluation

Following peer review, manuscripts are evaluated through the journal's academic editorial structure before a publication decision.

Important: Reviewer timelines, reviewer selection rules, revision rounds and decision categories should be added from the journal's formally approved peer-review policy before launch.